easaquatics
10-04-2006, 10:25
I have tried different carbon filter media from different manufacturers and would like to share what I have found so far and receive some feedback and experiences from other people who use carbon filtration.
I use 3liters of carbon in a large bag filter. I use a Beckman Phi 350 pH meter that is calibrated daily using a 3-point calibration (4, 7, 10.01)
The first carbon used was Kent's Reef Carbon (Manufacturers description: Removes organic pollutants, stains, and entrained toxic gases in marine and freshwater aquariums or ponds. Contains the finest pelletized activated bituminous coal based carbon. Pore size is in the 20 to 2,000 Angstrom range, ideally suited for removal of large organic molecules. Super activated with very high iodine and molasses numbers. Less than .2% ash making it suitable for sensitive species such as discus. Will not leach phosphates or promote undesirable algae growth, suited to sensitive reef systems! Engineered for water flow, will not clog easily like small granular or pelleted carbons. Out performs any carbon especially coconut shell!)
What I found: after thoroughly rinsing the carbon with RO water (pH 6.5), I found that in my 200+ gallon flow through system, the pH was immediately raised from 7.4 to 9.3, my monitors began to alarm within seconds.
Kent Reef Carbon Trial #2: after thoroughly rinsing the carbon with RO water (pH 6.5), I soaked it in RO for 24hrs, and found that the soak water was at pH 10.0, I rinsed again and soaked for another 24hrs and found that the pH dropped to 9.3, I repeated this process and found that it took at least 5 days to reach an acceptable pH of 7.8.
This has been confirmed by no less than 3 more trials.
So now I have purchased some Seachem Matrix Carbon (Manufacturers description: a truly unique activated carbon. It is formed as a spherical bead for optimum hydrodynamics, and will not pack. It permits maximum water flow and contact with its high density of macroporous binding sites. MatrixCarbon™ has a very low ash content as indicated by its minimal impact on pH. Even when added to distilled water, it does not raise pH above 7.0.While all carbons contain phosphate, regardless of false claims to the contrary, MatrixCarbon™ has the lowest detectable leachable phosphate content of all major carbon brands tested. MatrixCarbon™ outperforms other high grade carbons by at least two-fold when compared for total capacity to remove aquarium organic matter, rate of adsorption, and duration of use.) I have conducted the same sort of tests and this is what I have found:
After thoroughly rinsing the carbon with RO water (pH 6.5), I soaked it in RO for 24hrs, and found that the soak water was at pH 8.0. This is a full unit higher than is claimed by Seachem. I plan to do this test over and again and will update this thread. I rinsed again and soaked for another 24hrs and found that the pH dropped to 7.8. I rinsed again and soaked for another 24hrs and found that the pH dropped to 7.4; finally an acceptable reading because I keep the system at 7.4.
So the next question is, what is the basis for claims like: outperforms other high grade carbons by at least two-fold , and 1 L will EASILY treat 1600L for several months (when nutrient and waste loads are so highly variable)?
I have read and been told that acid washed carbons are the best to limit effect on pH, others say to simply rinse and soak for as much as a month. I would appreciate reading any thoughts and experiences that other people have had.
I use 3liters of carbon in a large bag filter. I use a Beckman Phi 350 pH meter that is calibrated daily using a 3-point calibration (4, 7, 10.01)
The first carbon used was Kent's Reef Carbon (Manufacturers description: Removes organic pollutants, stains, and entrained toxic gases in marine and freshwater aquariums or ponds. Contains the finest pelletized activated bituminous coal based carbon. Pore size is in the 20 to 2,000 Angstrom range, ideally suited for removal of large organic molecules. Super activated with very high iodine and molasses numbers. Less than .2% ash making it suitable for sensitive species such as discus. Will not leach phosphates or promote undesirable algae growth, suited to sensitive reef systems! Engineered for water flow, will not clog easily like small granular or pelleted carbons. Out performs any carbon especially coconut shell!)
What I found: after thoroughly rinsing the carbon with RO water (pH 6.5), I found that in my 200+ gallon flow through system, the pH was immediately raised from 7.4 to 9.3, my monitors began to alarm within seconds.
Kent Reef Carbon Trial #2: after thoroughly rinsing the carbon with RO water (pH 6.5), I soaked it in RO for 24hrs, and found that the soak water was at pH 10.0, I rinsed again and soaked for another 24hrs and found that the pH dropped to 9.3, I repeated this process and found that it took at least 5 days to reach an acceptable pH of 7.8.
This has been confirmed by no less than 3 more trials.
So now I have purchased some Seachem Matrix Carbon (Manufacturers description: a truly unique activated carbon. It is formed as a spherical bead for optimum hydrodynamics, and will not pack. It permits maximum water flow and contact with its high density of macroporous binding sites. MatrixCarbon™ has a very low ash content as indicated by its minimal impact on pH. Even when added to distilled water, it does not raise pH above 7.0.While all carbons contain phosphate, regardless of false claims to the contrary, MatrixCarbon™ has the lowest detectable leachable phosphate content of all major carbon brands tested. MatrixCarbon™ outperforms other high grade carbons by at least two-fold when compared for total capacity to remove aquarium organic matter, rate of adsorption, and duration of use.) I have conducted the same sort of tests and this is what I have found:
After thoroughly rinsing the carbon with RO water (pH 6.5), I soaked it in RO for 24hrs, and found that the soak water was at pH 8.0. This is a full unit higher than is claimed by Seachem. I plan to do this test over and again and will update this thread. I rinsed again and soaked for another 24hrs and found that the pH dropped to 7.8. I rinsed again and soaked for another 24hrs and found that the pH dropped to 7.4; finally an acceptable reading because I keep the system at 7.4.
So the next question is, what is the basis for claims like: outperforms other high grade carbons by at least two-fold , and 1 L will EASILY treat 1600L for several months (when nutrient and waste loads are so highly variable)?
I have read and been told that acid washed carbons are the best to limit effect on pH, others say to simply rinse and soak for as much as a month. I would appreciate reading any thoughts and experiences that other people have had.